B1 · Intermediate

Advanced Relative Clauses in English (B1)

This lesson extends relative clauses with whose for possession, whom in formal English, and clauses with prepositions. It helps you combine ideas into more sophisticated, natural sentences.

Once defining and non-defining clauses are secure, B1 adds the structures that make relative clauses genuinely flexible: prepositions inside relative clauses, quantifiers with of whom and of which, and reduced relative clauses that drop the pronoun and the verb entirely.

The preposition question is the most practical. English allows two positions — the natural spoken one, where the preposition stays at the end of the clause, and the formal written one, where it moves in front of the pronoun. The man I spoke to and The man to whom I spoke say the same thing in very different registers.

Reduced relative clauses are what make written English concise. The people who are waiting outside becomes The people waiting outside; the report which was written last year becomes the report written last year. Recognising these reductions is essential for reading, and using them is a clear step towards B2 writing.

A main clause, the woman is a doctor, with a dashed gap after the subject and the clause who lives next door arriving in it from below, an arrow running from the relative pronoun back to the woman. Underneath, two worked columns: a defining clause written without commas, which cannot be removed, and a non-defining clause fenced by two commas, which can be lifted out leaving my sister is a doctor.
Once the clause is visibly a unit posted into a slot, the harder patterns are variations on where that slot sits. A preposition can travel with the pronoun — the house in which she lived — and the pronoun can disappear altogether when it was the object of its own clause. Neither makes sense until you can see the clause as one thing with edges.

How to form Advanced Relative Clauses

The main advanced structures, from most conversational to most formal.
StructureRegisterExample
preposition at the endneutral, spokenThe person I work with is away.
preposition + whom/whichformal, writtenThe person with whom I work is away.
quantifier + of whomformalI have two brothers, both of whom live abroad.
quantifier + of whichformalShe wrote five books, none of which sold well.
reduced — activeneutralThe man standing by the door. (who is standing)
reduced — passiveneutralThe letters sent yesterday. (which were sent)
which for a whole clauseneutralHe resigned, which shocked everyone.

Advanced Relative Clauses: the key rules

  1. Prepositions can move in front of the pronoun in formal style: the person to whom, the house in which.

    The committee to whom the report was sent approved it.

  2. Which can refer to a whole previous clause, with a comma.

    The flight was delayed again, which ruined our plans.

  3. Quantifier + of + whom/which packs information elegantly.

    She has three brothers, all of whom are engineers.

  4. Where, when and why replace preposition + which after place, time and reason nouns.

    That was the year when everything changed; the reason why I stayed.

When to use Advanced Relative Clauses

Preposition at the end vs. fronted

Both are correct English. The choice signals register, not accuracy — despite an old prescriptive rule claiming otherwise.

End position — natural and common

Standard in speech and in most writing. The pronoun can often be dropped entirely.

The house we live in. The person I was talking about.

Fronted — formal

Preposition before whom or which. The pronoun cannot be dropped, and that is impossible.

The house in which we live. The person about whom I was talking.

Advanced Relative Clauses in example sentences

Advanced Relative Clauses in a real conversation

Notice the shift in register — the formal structures cluster in the written quotation.

Editor:Who's the writer you mentioned yesterday?

Assistant:Nadia Halim. She's the one whose last book won the prize.

Editor:What's the article about?

Assistant:She interviewed forty workers, most of whom asked to stay anonymous.

Editor:And the opening line?

Assistant:The conditions in which these people work have not changed since 1990.

Common mistakes (and how to fix them)

Practise Advanced Relative Clauses today

Practise moving between registers — the same idea in formal and informal form.

  1. Write four sentences with the preposition at the end, then rewrite each formally.
  2. Write four sentences using all of whom, most of which, none of whom and some of which.
  3. Reduce six full relative clauses, three active and three passive.
  4. Expand four reduced clauses back into full relative clauses with pronoun and verb.

Advanced Relative Clauses: frequently asked questions

Is it wrong to end a sentence with a preposition?

No. That rule was imported from Latin grammar in the seventeenth century and has never described how English actually works. The house I live in is completely standard and is what nearly every native speaker would say. The fronted version, the house in which I live, is equally correct but distinctly formal. Choose according to register, not correctness.

How do reduced relative clauses work?

You drop the relative pronoun together with the verb be. For active meanings the verb becomes an -ing form: the man who is waiting becomes the man waiting. For passive meanings it becomes a past participle: the car which was stolen becomes the car stolen. Reduction is only possible when the pronoun is the subject of the relative clause.

When do I need of whom rather than whose?

Whose shows possession directly — the writer whose book won. Of whom is used with a quantifier to describe part of a group — twenty students, five of whom failed. They are not interchangeable: you cannot say the writer of whom book won. Both are formal, but whose is far more common and works in speech as well as writing.

Can I reduce a non-defining clause?

Yes, and it is common in written English: My brother, who lives in Rome, becomes My brother, living in Rome. The commas stay in place. However the reduced version can read as slightly literary, and it occasionally introduces ambiguity about whether the clause is defining. In exam writing, keeping non-defining clauses in full is usually the safer choice.

Advertisement