One person pointing out somebody in a crowd on a platform, with a magnifier, a cap and a backpack nearby B1 · Intermediate

Relative Clauses in English (B1)

Relative clauses add detail to a noun and come in two kinds: defining clauses that identify, and non-defining clauses that simply add extra information. This lesson explains both and the punctuation they need.

Relative clauses let you pack more information into a single sentence, and at B1 the focus moves from simply choosing who or which to controlling the difference between defining and non-defining clauses, and knowing when the pronoun can be dropped.

A defining clause identifies which one you mean and is essential to the sentence: The man who fixed the boiler was excellent. Remove it and the listener does not know which man. A non-defining clause adds extra information about something already identified, and it is marked off by commas: My plumber, who fixed the boiler, was excellent.

That distinction has three practical consequences. Non-defining clauses cannot use that; they cannot drop the pronoun; and they always need commas. Defining clauses allow that, allow the pronoun to be omitted when it is the object, and never take commas. Getting this right is one of the clearest markers of B1 writing.

A main clause, the woman is a doctor, with a dashed gap after the subject and the clause who lives next door arriving in it from below, an arrow running from the relative pronoun back to the woman. Underneath, two worked columns: a defining clause written without commas, which cannot be removed, and a non-defining clause fenced by two commas, which can be lifted out leaving my sister is a doctor.
The pronoun is the half most learners already have. The bottom of the drawing is the half that decides punctuation: lift the clause out, and if the sentence can still tell you who is being talked about, the clause was extra and earns its two commas. If it cannot, no commas — and no which standing in for that either.

How to form Defining and Non-Defining Relative Clauses

What each clause type allows — the three differences that matter.
FeatureDefiningNon-defining
Commasnoyes
Can use thatyesno
Can omit the pronounyes, if it is the objectno, never
Purposeidentifies which oneadds extra detail
Can it be removed?no, meaning is lostyes, sentence still works
ExampleThe book that I bought was cheap.That book, which I bought yesterday, was cheap.

Defining and Non-Defining Relative Clauses: the key rules

  1. Defining clauses identify which one we mean (no commas); non-defining clauses add extra information between commas.

    The colleague who sits next to me is leaving. / Marta, who sits next to me, is leaving.

  2. In non-defining clauses, that is forbidden and the pronoun can never be dropped.

    The Louvre, which opened in 1793, is the world's most visited museum.

  3. In defining clauses, the object pronoun can vanish.

    The film (which) we watched last night was superb.

  4. Whose shows possession for people and things.

    That's the author whose novel won the prize.

When to use Defining and Non-Defining Relative Clauses

Defining vs. non-defining in practice

The commas genuinely change what the sentence claims, so this is a meaning distinction rather than a punctuation preference.

Defining — restricts the meaning

Only some of the group are being referred to. No commas.

The employees who work weekends get extra pay. (only those employees)

Non-defining — describes all of them

The whole group is meant; the clause simply adds information. Commas required.

The employees, who work weekends, get extra pay. (all of them work weekends)

Defining and Non-Defining Relative Clauses in example sentences

Defining and Non-Defining Relative Clauses in a real conversation

Listen for the commas — they tell you whether the clause is identifying or simply adding detail.

Recruiter:The candidate who called yesterday has withdrawn.

Head:Which one? The engineer whose portfolio we liked?

Recruiter:No, the other one. Petra, who interviewed on Monday, is still interested.

Head:Good. She's the one I'd prefer anyway.

Recruiter:The role, which was advertised internally first, had forty applicants.

Head:Then let's move quickly, which means deciding this week.

Common mistakes (and how to fix them)

Practise Defining and Non-Defining Relative Clauses today

Punctuation is where the marks are — practise adding and removing commas deliberately.

  1. Write four defining and four non-defining clauses about people you know.
  2. Take four defining sentences and add commas — explain how the meaning changes.
  3. Mark which of your defining clauses could drop the relative pronoun.
  4. Combine these: I read a book. It changed my mind. / My boss is retiring. She started in 1998.

Defining and Non-Defining Relative Clauses: frequently asked questions

When exactly can I omit the relative pronoun?

Only when two conditions are both met: the clause is defining, and the pronoun is the object of that clause. The film I watched works because I is the subject and the pronoun was the object. The film that won works only with the pronoun, because there the pronoun is the subject. A quick test is to look at the next word — if a subject follows immediately, the pronoun can go.

Why can I not use that in a non-defining clause?

It is a fixed convention of standard English rather than a logical necessity. Non-defining clauses take who for people and which for things: My car, which is ten years old, still runs well. Writing My car, that is ten years old is considered an error in careful writing and is penalised in exams. That belongs exclusively to defining clauses.

Can which refer to a whole sentence?

Yes, and it is very useful. In He forgot the tickets, which meant we missed the film, which refers to the entire preceding clause rather than to any single noun. This use is always non-defining and always takes a comma. Note that what cannot do this job in standard English — He forgot the tickets, what meant we missed the film is wrong.

Is whom still necessary?

Rarely. Whom is the object form, and modern English overwhelmingly uses who in both positions. Whom survives mainly directly after a preposition — to whom, for whom, with whom — and in formal writing. The people with whom I worked is correct but formal; The people I worked with is far more natural. Using whom incorrectly reads worse than not using it at all.

Advertisement